Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Bandanna's avatar

In order to lead the conversation, we need to have credibility when we put US oil and especially natural gas forward as a key contributor to energy supply going forward, deserving of whatever continued government support we can muster. A counter argument that doesn't involve a "net zero" agenda would be that we need all forms of energy, and most likely reductions in energy intensity in some lifestyles, to continue to support the standard of living we all supposedly aspire to. The request by a group of energy industry executives that the Biden IRA be cancelled altogether is a good start - stand by our support of free markets to allow energy providers to compete without backdoor subsidies and tax credit deals to provide what we need and let consumers decide. It's been known for some time that Permian production growth would be slowing and stopping, but since it doesn't sell data and services the theme wasn't popular. We've reached the point now where it's public knowledge, and need to be able to respond when asked how we plan to continue to support all the markets we've identified for "abundant, affordable, clean" natural gas going forward when prices have already increased by 2X vs last year. For a good summary of the current situation in the Permian, see:

https://www.oilystuff.com/forumstuff/forum-stuff/it-s-flagging-we-re-still-exporting

And as a consumer of data, do you want to support providers whose views didn't change until their clients started speaking out?

Expand full comment

No posts